Next comes this one, my third from Oneiros Books, based on a reading of Anti-Oedipus. Now, I am more inclined to write in terms of libidinal energy & its folds of perverse intensity than the philosophies of desire per se, but I like this idea too, anyway. These poems were actually better than I remembered them.
This book, of desire & the lesion that is the ego is here at Lulu.
We find it here at Amazon too. Och, som utlovad, här får vi köpa den på Bokus, i vanliga fall, fast den står nu som slutsåld. Återigen, ska detta åtgärdas så fort jag kan. Och då kommer den stå som tillgänglig på AdLibris med. EDIT: Nu finns boken tillbaka på Amazon
Blurb follows
Here are words to somewhat deconstruct your daily lives. McLean delivers
sermons of a beautiful nothing(s) enriched by perceptions that
pervasively cover the very lives you follow inanely day in, day out. He
dissects the mundane and the superfluity of existence (if any) with a
hacksaw and without much anaesthetic. His language is cutting, divisive,
insightful, deploring, archaic but strong with a fleshy boldness that
should and will be revered. David McLean seeks out the plastic and then
tends to look underneath the plasticity of what man has made; the
absurdity of god, the hilarity of societal values and the hypocritical
agenda of righteous folk. The lesion of what McLean explores in this
collection is indeed the nonsense that dominates us all whether aware or
unaware however, after you read this blistering book, you’ll be sure to
be angry at something in this dying world.
Craig Podmore (Author of The Origin of Manias, Oneiros Books)
Again, thanks to Michael Mc Aloran for the cover.
Here's some free samples, chosen at random.
indeterminate date of ever present death
it is indeterminate
so only a wicked old man with sharp swords
has all the answers,
cold as his fingers
he never touched with yet,
not with this flesh
straw and meaningless
You're a ghost on the highway
you're trash and meaningless
(The Gun Club)
and the honest rock we are
their words never moved an inch -
it remains this dreadful empty
skin shaking under sexual suns
and bowing down before nothing
their stupid forgiveness
is the inessential remembered -
not the decent murderer
and her dismembering:
this means nothing and no time
is left us, just one second
and it is heaven
stepping out
the ghosts have fallen outside where skin is
leaving the children we have never been
naked within us, a strange beast made of distances
and the insubstantial
staggering off to some scuzzy Bethlehem
to be ambitiously aborted, manky
matrix where little lives; and here is
meretricious potentiality, acne
and masturbation so dead god
is not even insane, just perverted
priests picking the flesh of children
from their dreamless teeth,
the ghosts are stepping out today
we are pretending not to live;
there is sufficient sin to simulate
and nothing to forgive
EDIT: Very grateful to Aad de Gids for the following review
of desire and the lesion that is the ego
review by Aad de
Gids
the best yet rather difficult notion derived from:
Capitalisme
et Schizophrenie I: L' Anti-Oedipe
Capitalisme et
SchizophrenieII: Mille Plateaux,
by
Gilles
Deleuze
and Felix
Guattari
is,
that
there wasn't an ontology displayed here. here we found not a theory
of being,a philosoohy
of being,an art-text
of being, rather a toolbox with elements of "what there is"
(as such they summarized it),
that left pretty much out all of the fucking theoremas
about psychoanalyse, psychology,
(conventional)
sociology,
(conventional)
psychiatry,
conclusivist
Nietzscheanism.
they said they were dead now,
"we
ourselves are already old",
fuck
them
all and look at how all is suffused with machines of desire.
dichotomy of sexuality is bullshit,
there
is a "microscopic transsexuality". instead of the
"ego"
(which is always Freud's
ego,or Marx's,or
Nietzsche's),
we
have a "pack of
wolves".
to system
theoreticians
they said: "there isn't a system that doesn't leak on all
sides". with "corps sans organes",
body
without organs,
they meant,
avant
la lettre,
for
instance Fukushima,
Soudan,
the
machinations around (and from) Iran,this
"multitude" of disinformation and profitist background
politics of the elite countries (US,
France,
England,
Germany,
perhaps
Japan,
Russia
and China)
who fuck up the so called "news" (like the American
conservatives
do) and make it a sleek
glacis
upon which all falters and stumbles and get disdirectional and
wrongly proportioned. this,
in
short about d-g.
David McLean is deeply informed by these insights, and has written a
"hybrid" book filled with "postpostmodern" and
"postpostpositivist" poems and longer text to again break
the codes in the sense of really breaking all conventionalist and
societal and poetic-theoretical, codes, even the poetic codes, to
nevertheless come up with a formidable and fun and challenging book.
_______________________________________________
enfolded
we are enfolded in the broken wings of time
stretched sad pinions holding birth and nothing
together, resolute and useless we are this inutile
futility – raging and permanence imagined
like bizarre statues insane on a shore
where inadequate birds swim a sickness
over us
we are enfolded in the nothing the soul sweats
instead of love, nothing is as nothing does
_______________________________________________
i
think the poems of David
also do not found or postulate an ontology rather they point at "what
there is" as i notably still remember in a poem of his an old
computer standing in the surf. "meaning" somehow erodes
here,
while
the artefacts do still hold contingent resemblances with objects that
"define" our world now,
or
at least we assume they are defining us. i think David's
poetry kind of sits in
between
this post-Adornean
and post-Wittgensteinian
position where they said,
respectively:
"um
zu sagen, was sie nicht sagen kann, während es doch nur von der
Kunst gesagt werden kann, indem sie es nicht sagt"
and "wovon man nicht sprechen kann darüber soll man schweigen".
i have always believed the ensharpened differences between these two
adages
in fact were overrated and one could detect a common ground here.
there is definitely an affirmation of "world" in both and
they wanted to make sure
its
expression wasn't fucked up. i think the poets of our generation do
just that. we're not so much indebted anymore either to the old
whores Freud-Nietzsche-Marx,
nor
to the somewhat newer theoreticians of the Frankfurter
Schule,
French
post-structuralism
or even Rorty-Apel-Searle-Habermas-Dennett-Žižek.
_____________________________________________
all
the mad grannies
and it was all the mad grannies, dozing depressive at home and sewing
psychosis, little mittens to cover the fingers that are not so very
innocent today, and a strange fern smelling occidental and time
travelers, the Victorian answer, guns and butter.
the houses are made of gray and tomorrow foreclosed by the nightmare
wait of history. all the mad grannies chasing wicked cats that come
through angles and corners, the homeless evil that needs bodies to be
in it, essential freedom and all the generations hopeless psychosis
needs to grow healthy enough to upset a doctor or some other moron,
all the deep fried suicides and god in every little wooden box a
granny's granny once forget when a more serious sort of history was,
and the contracts are missing and absence. all the dead men and
Christ in a sweaty sidecar riding sexy and erect beside them; all the
mad grannies have Valium to believe in – they do not need men or
gods or the superfluity that is feeling, they have overdosed on the
weight of Being; they have drugs but they do not really seem to need
them – anything is better than freedom
_____________________________________________
now, after David's sublime writing, it is obvious a lot of things
became superfluous.
exactly this could be of weightless
liberation,to have dumped all lexicological offal: "and the
contracts are missing and absence. all the dead men and Christ in a
sweaty sidecar riding sexy".